Skip to comments.
Sen. Specter Faces Tough Challenge in Pennsylvania
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| 4-27-04
| John Whitesides
Posted on 04/27/2004 12:15:08 PM PDT by jmstein7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: LibFreeUSA
"Arrogance and overblown personal ego is a byprduct of such a duration, not to mention a walking RINO as well.Which is why term limits are a good idea.
21
posted on
04/27/2004 1:16:06 PM PDT
by
TOUGH STOUGH
(A vote for president Bush IS a vote for principle.)
To: philly-d-kidder; aviator
I just voted for ToomeyWell, what are you two doing here? Go back and vote again! And hurry up!
22
posted on
04/27/2004 1:16:37 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Revolting cat!
I would go vote again but those old gals at the polling place look pretty sharp! I think they would notice.
23
posted on
04/27/2004 1:23:38 PM PDT
by
linn37
(Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
To: jmstein7
I don't want to lose the Senate. I'm split here. There's no guarantee that the GOP will retain the Senate if Specter wins. Specter votes with RATS - Yeah I know it's an election year and he suddenly morphed into a conservative - but it's important to flush out these backstabbing RINOs like Specter, McCain, Snowe, Hatch, etc. who'll impede Bush's next term.
Besides, it's better if Hoeffel wins if he faces Specter in the general. At least Specter won't get his grimy hands on the Supremes.
24
posted on
04/27/2004 1:33:12 PM PDT
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: jmstein7
I heard on Sean Hannity about an hour ago. Unofficial exit polls froma Lancaster paper shows Toomey with 51%. It's going to be close.
GO PAT GO.
To: BibChr
ditto that
26
posted on
04/27/2004 1:55:20 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: ssantomaur
Get Out The Vote, People!
BORK SPECTER!
27
posted on
04/27/2004 1:58:23 PM PDT
by
Checkers
To: jmstein7
"Specter, a four-term senator from Pennsylvania and one of the last of the Senate's moderate Republicans.." Reuter cleanup in aisle one!
"Specter, a four-term RINO senator from Pennsylvania and one of the last of the Senate's moderate extremely liberal Republicans..."
There, that's better.
Oh, and bye-bye Mr. Scottish-Law Argyle McSphincter, it has been "Not Proven" that you are worth more than a Daschole-Democrat.
To: jmstein7
What's the choice...heaven or hell.
I have a pretty good guess about old Arlen's future venue.
29
posted on
04/27/2004 2:01:27 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: BibChr
He's an enemy with an R. We're well rid of him. Right on brother.
30
posted on
04/27/2004 2:02:34 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: ssantomaur
Toomey needs to win in Lancaster by more than that IMO..
He needs atleast 60-65%.. It's considered one of his strongholds.
To: Truth Table
I agree. I'm sure the vast majority of FREEPERS are more ideologically in sync with Toomey than with a RINO like Specter (not even mentioning his infamous work with the Warren Commission or his love of "Scottish Law".
Normally, although I consider myself a hard-core conservative, I nonetheless think in practical terms - namely that a RINO win is usually better than a conservative loss in November, paricularly in the case where control of the Senate may be at stake. (Even though my heart and instincts supported McClintock for Governor of California, I would have nonethteless probably voted for Arnold knowing that a conservative like McClintock simply can't win statewide anymore in an increasingly liberal state like California._
In this case, however, all of the intangibles mitigate for conservatives to support Pat Toomey even if Arlen Specter is arguably more "electable" in the Fall.
First, Senate control is really not at stake for Republicans barring a landslide defeat across the board (which would likely sweep Specter away as well).
Second, Specter would become Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and be in a position to block President Bush's more conserative nominees; A scary prospect, especially when we may have two or three Supreme Court vacancies next term;
Third, he would be 80 when his term is complete; He therefore effectively after re-election becomes a lame duck who will be free to indulge his liberal instincts and, like John McCain, become one of the media's favorite voices of "moderation" to which they can use to show how "out of the mainstream" conservatives are.
Fourth, he has had some major health problems recently and if he were to be unable to finish his term, then he would be replaced by a Dem.
Finally, unlike states like Rhode Island or New Jersey where ONLY RINOS can get elected statewide, Pennsylvania has elected and re-elected Senator Santorum, which indicates to me that Toomey would indeed have a fighting chance against the liberal Congressman Hoeffel.
All in all, I am squarely behind Toomey and a win here would be a HUGE message to send to other RINO incumbents about paying attention to their base....
32
posted on
04/27/2004 2:15:08 PM PDT
by
larlaw
To: jmstein7
You won't lose the Senate. Specter votes 70% like Kerry. You can only win.
33
posted on
04/27/2004 2:16:47 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Neocon Chickenhawk for War like Liberal Cuckoo for Welfare. Both freeload.)
To: Honestfreedom
i guess you like ruth ginsburg
34
posted on
04/27/2004 2:20:50 PM PDT
by
camas
To: larlaw
Excellent and well penned analysis. I agree with you on each and every point. Kudos.
To: linn37
LOL! yup, they all know me by name, here in my small rural polling place, so one vote for Pat is all I'll be able to cast. :)
To: camas
I liked Robert Bork and guess who cast a critical vote against him? Hint it was not Toomey. I don't remember Specter or any other Republican opposing Ginsburg.
To: Petronski
I plan to smile all week if MacSpectre goes down!
Dan
38
posted on
04/27/2004 2:54:28 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I voted and thought of you, Dan!
39
posted on
04/27/2004 3:00:15 PM PDT
by
JenB
To: Truth Table
Thanks - let's hope the G.O.P. primary voters in Pennsylvania are also on the same wavelength!
40
posted on
04/27/2004 3:59:23 PM PDT
by
larlaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson