To: american colleen; sinkspur; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; ...
About as clear, concise, and straightforward as one can be on the topic.
2 posted on
04/27/2004 8:40:53 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ninenot; Coleus
John Kerry should have to explain publicly why he believes he should be allowed to take communion while simultaneously supporting the murder of millions of unborn babies. His "explanation" would probably do more for the pro-life cause than denying him communion.
Someone should also look into what were the grounds of the annulment of Kerry's first marriage.
If John Kerry wants to live like a non-Catholic, that's his preregative, but if so he shouldn't be able to claim to be a Catholic.
5 posted on
04/27/2004 8:49:21 AM PDT by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: ninenot
Judging from the foregoing considerations, it seems clear that a politician who votes in a way that fails to defend innocent human life on a consistent basis and gives every indication of his intention to keep doing so despite warnings from ecclesiastical authorities can be said to obstinately persist in objectively evil behavior of a public nature. And in this regard he fulfills the requirements of Canon 915. Excellent.
10 posted on
04/27/2004 9:01:15 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson