Replies

I corrected myself in the next post.

I have not been asked by anyone to stop doing anything, though you have a history of telling lies about me and I am citing your numerous posts suggesting I post under multiple handles.

There has never been any question that Anslar al-Islam operated in the American No Fly Zone of Northern Iraq and frequently clashed with our 'allies' the Kurds. There is absolutely nothing new in this alleged breaking news, though you are signaling to the forum that you don't know much about the situation.

Domestic and foreign intelligence services have characterized Anslar al-Islam relationship with Saddam's government to minimal to nothing and that is the only question at hand.

I was told by two people that you post under multiple handles. If I/they were wrong, I apologize.

You have been asked to stop posting crap like this however. In your own words:

The elite that pushed the war were liberals; they used their media connections to convince the American people that they were under attack, an act of supreme anti-patriotism, to capture political support for the war. That the whole war was debt financed speaks to the leftwing nature of the entire enterprise.

Furthermore, the logic that has the United States building a nation in the Middle East is strictly leftwing and the current rationale for the war that Saddam was a bad-man is pure Clintonism. The seductive simplicity of total evil versus total good can overwhelm the obvious logical and ethical problems of building a democracy at gunpoint-- an idea that comes from the French liberal, Rousseau.

That said, the owner of the site has made it clear he does not want this debate on this site, and I respect his wishes, but I would be happy to carry on over Freep Mail.

60 posted on 04/09/2004 11:03:47 AM EDT by JohnGalt

You still aren't answering the fact that you constantly condemn those who use violation of UN Secuty Council resolutions as a reason for war. You condemn the UN constantly, and rightly so.

And yet here you are, using the UN and an article written about them and their "decision" that there is no linkage. Hah!

Also, using a European source as saying there is no linkage is as funny as the UN auditing themselves in the oil for food program.