Look, Peach - I don't know why you are trying so hard to argue with a position I'm not taking. Must be easier than arguing with one that I am.
If there is proof - not association - of SH running the Ansar camp, fine. People have been asserting that for two years, but they haven't proven it yet. My position is that the "information" in the posted article - that the Jordan terrorist got training or hooked up with Zarqawi in Iraq - does not constitute proof of Baghdad's involvement because Baghdad did not control the area where Ansar was HQ'd. That's it. I'm not arguing about other proof, and you aren't presenting any. But the posted article at the top of the thread does not even begin to provide the kind of "vindication" you are crowing about.
Of course, you'll run from this like you do everything else.
Do you believe that Saddam Hussein HAD NO KNOWLEDGE of ANY chemical weapons training going on in his country and that SH had no knowledge that AL Qaeda was in his country planning or plotting any hostile action against the west?