[LenS]

Then your position makes no sense sinse either Specter or a Democratic chairman would be pro-choice, not pro-life. Besides, this will probably be Specter's last race. I'd say the odds are good that if the Senate is tied after November, he'll switch parties to maximize his position.

[NittanyLion]

Then your position makes no sense sinse either Specter or a Democratic chairman would be pro-choice, not pro-life.

I think his point is that Specter would be replaced by a Republican with a more conservative take on judicial issues. It's unlikely that the GOP will lose the Senate regardless of this race's outcome.

[Josh in PA]

Then your position makes no sense sinse either Specter or a Democratic chairman would be pro-choice, not pro-life. Besides, this will probably be Specter's last race. I'd say the odds are good that if the Senate is tied after November, he'll switch parties to maximize his position.

=====


First, I'm under the assumption that GOP picks up seats this fall. Based on all recent information, It looks extremely likely this will happen..

Somebody posted on another thread, that in order for Democrats to takeover the senate, they must win 8 of 10 open seats. We can afford to throw this one to the wolves.