Skip to comments.
BUSH MAKES THE CALL: NO FULL SCALE FALLUJAH OFFENSIVE
The Drudge Report ^
| April 25, 2004
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 04/25/2004 5:30:14 PM PDT by threat matrix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 441-456 next last
To: McGavin999
Don't confuse them with facts, McGavin.
It might make them feel bad.
261
posted on
04/25/2004 7:24:25 PM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: Austin Willard Wright
LOL! A vote for a Libertarian is a vote for Kerry.
Smart, Austin. Smart.
262
posted on
04/25/2004 7:25:32 PM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: FreeReign
Like Vietnam we are doomed to failure in Iraq.
In Vietnam we took great care to avoid a larger war with the Chinese and the Russians and here we are reluctant to engage Islam.
We had and still have the military capabilities just not the political capabilities.
Read: In Retrospect by Robert McNamara
263
posted on
04/25/2004 7:25:47 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(Demoncrats gave us Vietnam and Gay Marriages- What more damage could they do to our society ?)
To: Jim Noble
IMO, Bush has to crush Fallujah, or he goes home in January. Fallujah is a city of 300,000 people of which about 200,000 still remain in the city. Out of those 200,000 people, maybe about 1,000 are bad guys.
IMO, the president's purpose in Fallujah is not to crush the 200,000. It's to get the remaining thousand or so bad guys.
To: ohioWfan
265
posted on
04/25/2004 7:26:30 PM PDT
by
AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
To: Polybius
Yeah, but the thing is this idelology isn't just in those two cities. It is just that those two cities are main instances of violent armed terror. But terror has been happening all over Iraq, in Baghdad, Basra. The US must target the ideology. It isn't just about a person or a group, it is about what is driving them to hate us.
266
posted on
04/25/2004 7:26:34 PM PDT
by
yonif
("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
To: Miss Marple
"The objective is to win the war on terror, not make oneself look good to armchair generals. You don't have the intelligence that the generals and the President have. You are basing your entire rants on a headline on Drudge."
Reread my posts Miss Marple. I'm with you 100%. And I'm glad you haven't shot your husband. But I'd understand if you at least considered it on occassion.
267
posted on
04/25/2004 7:27:33 PM PDT
by
Rokke
To: Polybius
In Gaza, the IDF succeeds in going after the physical enemy. It is a small place. But its wider goal should be to remove the cancer from the population. The cancer being spread by the schools, TV stations and the Palestinian Authority regime. This is going unhindered. The IDF could take down the TV stations telling children to go murder Jews, but a political decision prevents them from doing so.
268
posted on
04/25/2004 7:28:05 PM PDT
by
yonif
("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
To: Southack
Thanks. Been reading this thread for a while now. Long and getting longer.
I think Generals Conway and Mattis know what they are doing.
My glass is half full. Count me amongst those who think it is brilliant.
269
posted on
04/25/2004 7:28:54 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I always thought the Yankees had something to do with it)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
thanks
270
posted on
04/25/2004 7:29:31 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I always thought the Yankees had something to do with it)
To: victoryatallcosts
senior U.S. military and civilian officials have decided to try to confront a band of hard-core Sunni Muslim insurgents by having Marines conduct patrols in the city alongside Iraqi security forces... Developing... This pretty much says that we've decided to place greater importance on the lives of Iraqis than on the lives of our Marines. I can't fathom how the President can make this decision given that it is likely to lead to the deaths of many more Marines than would be killed from an all-out attack which is pre-ceded by a massive arial bombardment of Falujah.
This is akin to arguing it would have been better to invade Japan instead of nuking it so as not to upset the local population.
271
posted on
04/25/2004 7:29:58 PM PDT
by
DiscoStu1979
(Disco Stu Likes Disco Music)
To: Peach
Why isn't the military deciding what is best?They generally do, but they have to follow the goal set by the President.
272
posted on
04/25/2004 7:31:15 PM PDT
by
DiscoStu1979
(Disco Stu Likes Disco Music)
To: Austin Willard Wright
...twists and turns of Dubya's war policyAu contraire. This president is steady as they come. You won't find him following the latest polls or listening to the gloom and doom set to make important decisions.
273
posted on
04/25/2004 7:31:24 PM PDT
by
ride the whirlwind
(We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
To: FreeReign
IMO, the president's purpose in Fallujah is not to crush the 200,000. It's to get the remaining thousand or so bad guys.If war were brain surgery, history would be very, very different.
274
posted on
04/25/2004 7:31:58 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
To: DiscoStu1979
your dead meat man.
We don't cotton to new folks around these parts!
275
posted on
04/25/2004 7:32:44 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(Demoncrats gave us Vietnam and Gay Marriages- What more damage could they do to our society ?)
To: DiscoStu1979
c#218
276
posted on
04/25/2004 7:32:50 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: jayef
Would you rather we just go in and turn the entire country against us by killing an entire city of innocent people?
Yes, some soldiers will die. Probably more would die if we went in with a full-scale assault.
Patience will win this war, not half-assed plans thinking we can just march in and kill everyone and not have the people trying to help us instead start helping the enemy!
277
posted on
04/25/2004 7:33:27 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: AndrewC
Thanks for the definition. What you said doesn't fit it.
And, no.........I didn't serve under any of those Presidents, but I do know why morale dropped under them.
But you are jumping wildly to a conclusion based on a single solitary sensationalistic headline by Drudge, and therefore your negativism is baseless.
278
posted on
04/25/2004 7:33:27 PM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: Samurai_Jack
Read post 13 and get a clue.
279
posted on
04/25/2004 7:34:32 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
To: threat matrix
This is exactly how LBJ used to wage war in Vietnam. Take the planning from the military and run it out of the White House basement. Bush is going wobbley. Terrible move.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 441-456 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson