Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
I wonder if all the anit-hydrogen/anti-fuel cell FReepers are going to show up telling us that this is only theoretical lab stuff and is an impossible lunacy for practical use?
16 posted on 04/23/2004 7:28:21 AM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: templar
I wonder if all the anit-hydrogen/anti-fuel cell FReepers are going to show up telling us that this is only theoretical lab stuff and is an impossible lunacy for practical use?

Liquid Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel cells are old technology -- for example, that's what the Shuttle uses for its power source.

The folks you're talking about are discussing automotive fuel cells, which aren't terribly amenable to cryogenic fuel cells....

18 posted on 04/23/2004 7:36:38 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: templar
Fuel cells are perfect for subs. I would imagine that such a sub would require a lot more refueling stops when compared to a nuclear sub though.

I used to work for Treadwell. They have one product - oxygen generators for US Navy submarines. When I left, they were pushing hard for a membrane based oxygen generator - essentially the opposite of a fuel cell.
24 posted on 04/23/2004 1:23:43 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson