Replies

I don't think it would be good if NATO pulls out completely. We need NATO in Kosovo no matter what anybody says. It is true, however, that American KFOR did the best job, but it's the effect of soldier professionalism. Damn, we have european armies where marches are being canceled if it's raining! So, what we realy need is NATO controlled return of serbian troops in serbian ghettos, to be more precise in areas populated by serbs prior june 1999, in full accord with UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Albanians must not be rewarded for their ethnic cleansing. Today they burned down church of St. Catherine in Central Kosovo! So, after serbian troops return in serbian enclaves, serbian refugees should come back. NATO and KFOR and UN should restrain albanians from attacking serbian police and refugees. They know how and they could do it if they only want. That should be the basis for further negotiatiations between albanian comunity and Belgrade.
US would act in accord with UN SC res. , albanians would be punished by the mere fact that serbian refugees are coming back to their homes, and NATO presence, led by US, would be desperately needed in future, so both albanians and serbs would feel secure for their lives and property. So peaceful talks could follow up.

Critics welcome! :-)

p.s. Doesn't this "drowning report" story sound like UN report that somehow got "lost" on Markale (I think 1st Markale) bomb explosion, when serbs were held responsible?
Also, it was never proven serbs were responsible for Vasa Miskin street bomb massacre, not 2nd markale. I was standing in the place where granade hit the Vasa Miskin street. It looks very suspicious. High buildings on both sides and narrow street between buildings. How come granade didn't hit the wall of the building? Strange things happen, people! But the most absurd in "kids drowning story" is that "serbs chased albanian kids". Like serbs are free to move out from their ghettos to take a walk, or go to jogging , my God! :-)))