Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueNgold
A request was submitted, and approved, for the recognition of the 'V', which by rights should have been done at the time.

You're the first I've seen who said that. Why does nobody else get that? who also served. And what form was submitted? I see a Form 214 and 215. The 214 mentions this "V", but the 215 does not. I think his citations mention the "V" (i.e. "authorized to wear combat 'v'"). And the 214 appears to be from the early '70s. You lost me, here.

request was submitted, and approved

What, when and approved by who? Are these secretive documents that have yet to be made public?

657 posted on 07/19/2004 9:10:26 AM PDT by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies ]


To: sevry

You are correct that Kerry's 214 mentions the "V" device. The DD215 does not need to menition it since it is only used to amend what is incorrect on the DD215. Kerry also adds the PUC and NUC unit citations, which were probably approved after he left the service. To me, he is guilding the lilly.


660 posted on 07/19/2004 9:18:29 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson