Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
The argument could be that church bells are historical since our country was founded on Christianity.

I wonder what Judge Moore's opinion of this is.
74 posted on 04/21/2004 12:20:49 PM PDT by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: texastoo
"The argument could be that church bells are historical since our country was founded on Christianity."

For a long time in this country, it was understood that the government could enforce what was called "general Christianity," a kind of non-denominational obeisance to Biblical and Christian principles; this was not believed to violate the First Amendment. It was understood that Christianity had a certain "pride of place" in the USA and that public policy, and the law, could defend specifically Christian values - hence the "blue laws" of yesteryear, swearing on the Bible, etc. Needless to say, this doctrine has severely eroded in the last 50 years, and it is unlikely it could be resurrected in this instance to ban the Islamic prayer.
83 posted on 04/21/2004 12:28:00 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson