[FormerLib]

It's actually the "breeders" as referenced above -- those who Plan their children like good little citizens and those who avail themselves of the sort of technologies providing our pro-life president with "stem cell lines" to purposefully destroy -- who have nailed down the "rights" of homosexual couples to ape traditional marriage.

That statement is as nonsensical as "homosexual marriage", which no one has a "right" to and which any society that invents such a "right" will not be long for this world anyway.

[Askel5]

=== That statement is as nonsensical as "homosexual marriage", which no one has a "right" to and which any society that invents such a "right" will not be long for this world anyway.

Okay ... try this one, then:

That statement is as nonsensical as "NonProcreative Sex," "Conception without Procreation", or the right to "privacy" which is aborting one's own child ... none of which anyone has a "right" to. Any society that invents such "rights" will not be long for this world anyway.

Or will need to work hard at drafting in a breeder underclass until folks are comfortable with letting "stem cell lines" be born from artificial uteruses for use as drones.