Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpyGuy
Mohammed was the "Charles Manson" of the seventh century.

I'm thinking more the L. Ron Hubbard of the seventh century.

38 posted on 04/17/2004 8:27:49 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessee_Bob
People are always going to demand kooky explanations for those things they value most. Better they find what they want in Scientology than Islam. I've never known a Scientologist to blow himself up in a crowded coffee shop.

_Stranger in a Srange Land_ gives an interesting spin on this idea.

40 posted on 04/17/2004 8:38:24 AM PDT by beavus (People proclaim to believe most assuredly that which they understand the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee_Bob
There's a big difference (imho) between scn & islam - scn costs a lot of money, which limits access by the masses. Islam seems to be much easier to "spread", seeing how it seems to require only access to a koran and a local leader (ok, as well as maybe a prayer rug and a compass).

Also, scn seems to carry out it's dirty work via a central organization (flag), whereas islam relies on individuals to blow themselves up or fight.

42 posted on 04/17/2004 8:47:19 AM PDT by searchandrecovery (Ward Cleaver - "A thing is either right or it's wrong".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson