Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts
I didn't attack him without cause.

He doesn't cut it in the intellect department.

He may have charm, charisma, Texas style, and be a good ole' boy (all good things) but he ain't a sharp tack.

He kept repeating the same thing, four times, as answers to different questions. That's why he has to answer questions like tonight's "Why do you have to appear with Cheney?" (at the upcoming hearing).

405 posted on 04/13/2004 8:06:31 PM PDT by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: tubavil
Clinton was considered sharp as a tack as you say and I considered him one of the worst Presidents this country ever had...
423 posted on 04/13/2004 8:09:06 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: tubavil
He kept repeating the same thing, four times, as answers to different questions. That's why he has to answer questions like tonight's "Why do you have to appear with Cheney?" (at the upcoming hearing).

Give me the list of questions he answered the same thing to.

434 posted on 04/13/2004 8:12:00 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: tubavil
"I didn't attack him without cause.

He doesn't cut it in the intellect department.

He may have charm, charisma, Texas style, and be a good ole' boy (all good things) but he ain't a sharp tack.

He kept repeating the same thing, four times, as answers to different questions. That's why he has to answer questions like tonight's "Why do you have to appear with Cheney?" (at the upcoming hearing)."


Then you heard a different set of questions than I did, every freaking question, had the same "INTENT" and there was but one answer for the STUPID questions asked.

All questions were accusatory, insulting and were not after "news" rather an attempt to trip President Bush up so these vapid lazy disrespectful media whores could make news.
441 posted on 04/13/2004 8:14:04 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: tubavil
"He kept repeating the same thing, four times, as answers to different questions."

That's the mark of a good politician. He had his game on.

You stay on message. In any political speech directed to the general public you usually want to stick to no more than 3 points, and keep repeating them.

In this case, Bush really had only 1 point for the whole press conference.

He hammered it home. It will stick.

he will keep hammering it again and again over the next several months.

Likely it appears to become his major campaign theme.

"I mean what I say" "We're gonna stay the course. We're gonna change the world. We're gonna improve American security. We're gonna bring liberty to the people of Iraq and change the mideast. He actually said he was gonna win the war on terror.

A political speech, from a politician in a political campaign period.

457 posted on 04/13/2004 8:21:14 PM PDT by Mark Felton (Perfection is an imperfect concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: tubavil
I didn't realize that a person with an I.Q. of 85 could pilot a jet. If that's the case, I'm waaaay underemployed.
459 posted on 04/13/2004 8:21:39 PM PDT by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: tubavil
He kept repeating the same thing, four times, as answers to different questions.
Ah, you noticed that? You're a bit smarter than I initially thought. Unfortunately you're not swift enough to understand why he did that. It's known as staying on message. He is very good at it.
476 posted on 04/13/2004 8:30:32 PM PDT by Quicksilver (WMD: absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson