Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: So Cal Rocket
we would have seen it all in 1979—and not in 2001

didn't read the whole thing- but it occurs to me that one HUGE difference bewteen then and now was the unfavorable (IIRC) balance of power between the US and the USSR.

whether or not the disparity was real...it was (IIRC) a real consideration for the military planners at the time. Both in terms of conventional & nuclear weapons.

A full blown attack on iran would have been seen as a reckless gamble with unforeseeable, possibly disastrous consequences.

I wonder if 14 years of unopposed super-powerdom have colored the lenses the authors use when looking at the past.

25 posted on 04/13/2004 9:08:07 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thatcher; Beau Schott
[This 25th Anniversary Year Of Khomeinism

As Jimmy Carter also proved in November 1979, one man really can make a difference.

But don't expect any sober discussion of these contentions from the Left. Their gloom and doom about Iraq arises precisely from the anti-Americanism and romanticization of the Third World that once led to our appeasement and now seeks its return. When John Kerry talks of mysterious prominent Europeans he has met (but whose names he will not divulge) who, he says, pray for his election in hopes of ending George Bush's Iraqi nightmare, perhaps he has in mind people like the Chamberlainesque European Commission president Romano Prodi, who said in the wake of the recent mass murder in Spain: Clearly, the conflict with the terrorists is not resolved with force alone. Perhaps he has in mind, also, the Spanish electorate, which believes it can find security from al-Qaida terrorism by refuting all its past support for America's role in the Middle East. But of course if the terrorists understand that, in lieu of resolve, they will find such appeasement a mere 48 hours after a terrorist attack, then all previously resolute Western democracies, Italy, Poland, Britain, and the United States should expect the terrorists to murder their citizens on the election eve in hopes of achieving just such a Spanish-style capitulation.

In contrast, George W. Bush, impervious to such self-deception, has, in a mere two and a half years, reversed the perilous course of a quarter-century. Since September 11, he has removed the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, begun to challenge the Middle East through support for consensual government, isolated Yasser Arafat, pressured the Europeans on everything from anti-Semitism to their largesse to Hamas, removed American troops from Saudi Arabia, shut down fascistic Islamic charities, scattered al-Qaida, turned Pakistan from a de facto foe to a scrutinized neutral, rounded up terrorists in the United States, pressured Libya, Iran, and Pakistan to come clean on clandestine nuclear cheating, so far avoided another September 11 and promises that he is not nearly done yet. If the Spanish example presages further terrorist attacks on European democracies at election time, at least Mr. Bush has made it clear that America alone if need be will neither appease nor ignore such killers but in fact finish the terrible war that they started.

As Jimmy Carter also proved in November 1979, one man really can make a difference. ]

A brilliant contrast between Carter and Bush ~ Toni

26 posted on 04/14/2004 2:00:59 PM PDT by antonia ("Democracy is the worst type of government, excepting all others." ~ Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson