I'm also a Precincy Chair for Bush/cheney as well as another Precinct Chair for the MNGOP. I'm also the Communications Coordinator for a city precinct for Bush/Cheney.
Yes, I know that a paper, upon receiving 100 mass e-mails will regard it as 100 mass e-mails. Sure, they know your're listening but they're unlikely to print more than one. The one represents the all.
Our Congressmen FILTER our e-mails limiting their interest to ones not mass generated and only paying attention to those within their district.
But go ahead, mass e-mail all you want. I've also submitted my e-mails through the Bush/Cheney website and will continue to do so. But, they will limited effectiveness. It's not meant to be effective. It's meant to generate numbers. To that end, it will be successful.
I'm sorry .. demographics don't support your claim that 100 email are counted as 100 emails.
Every email received by media represents THOUSANDS of emails. Even if each email was worth only 1000 emails, that would mean 100 emails represents ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND EMAILS.
I know how demographics work and maybe the newspaper only prints 1 letter - but that means they receieved thousands of letters saying almost the same thing.
I've been in the Congressional offices in Wash DC as recently as 3 years ago .. and I can tell you that each and every email is looked at for content and the information is catagorized according to yea or nay on any given issue. At least that's what I saw when I was there.
As a "Communications Coordinator" you have a very negative attitude. At least that's what I'm getting from you when you say things like: "limited effectiveness; not meant to be effective". If it wasn't "meant to be effective" then why on earth would you do it.
I don't know why, but I am very suspicious that you are not who you say you are. But .. nevertheless .. with your negative attitude, I would never hire you to do anything.