Skip to comments.
Outrage at new mass slaughter of baby seals
Guardian ^
| 04/11/04
| Mark Townsend
Posted on 04/10/2004 6:53:21 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: nkycincinnatikid
After housecats?
21
posted on
04/10/2004 7:40:28 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
To: nkycincinnatikid
Taste fishy. Kinda like dolpin.
22
posted on
04/10/2004 7:41:12 PM PDT
by
Dinsdale
To: IncPen; Pikamax
A baby seal walks into a bar. Bartender says, "What can I get ya?" Seal says, "Anything but a Canadian Club".
23
posted on
04/10/2004 7:41:58 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I hate Times New Roman... and it's all Mel Gibson's fault!)
To: Pikamax
This is a slaughter, not a hunt.
I guess I won't being going to Newfoundland for vacation.
Bunch of bloodthirsty killers living up there.
24
posted on
04/10/2004 8:00:10 PM PDT
by
ASTM366
To: Pikamax
So these two baby harp seals walk up to the bar, and one says, "I'll have a Canadian Club on the Rocks"
25
posted on
04/10/2004 8:01:40 PM PDT
by
Piranha
To: ASTM366
If they wern't meant to be made into coats they wouldn't have ever grown fur, at least desirable fur!
Time for a bigger club!
26
posted on
04/10/2004 8:09:01 PM PDT
by
dalereed
(,)
To: ASTM366
I agree.
Don't be put off by the "seeing animals in pain is the only way I can get wood" crowd. They tend to show up on all of these threads. They are as predictable as the "how can anyone be concerned about this when abortion ..... " posters.
27
posted on
04/10/2004 8:38:15 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: dalereed
yo, man--are you bald? i'm a gittin' my club ready.
28
posted on
04/10/2004 8:58:21 PM PDT
by
drhogan
To: drhogan
i mean, if men weren't made to be clubbed and skinned, they wouldn't have grown hair. it's SO obvious.
29
posted on
04/10/2004 9:00:17 PM PDT
by
drhogan
To: Pikamax
This morning, the New York TIMES featured -- front page, above the fold, the best position they have -- a photo of a jubilant Iraqi waving a pair of boots stripped from a dead GI. The symbolism here is almost eerie -- and nauseating. In the TIMES view, it's cause for celebration when you kill GIs and take their boots, and it's fine to kill babies up until they are being born, to harvest stem cells and organs. But don't you dare kill fur seals to harvest pelts.
30
posted on
04/10/2004 9:03:16 PM PDT
by
T'wit
("Now and then, an innocent man is elected to Congress" -- Will Rogers)
To: annyokie
Sick and a evil. Shame on the pigs that heartlessly slaughter helpless defenseless infants.
31
posted on
04/10/2004 9:10:51 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: T'wit
it seems to me that killing unborn children, US soldiers, AND baby harp seals is bad. I can't believe that God would want his creatures slaughtered in such a cruel way.
it's not like the baby harp seals are killing unborn children. i don't even understand the logic here.
32
posted on
04/10/2004 9:13:05 PM PDT
by
drhogan
To: drhogan
"are you bald? i'm a gittin' my club ready"
Not bald but there isn't a hair oin my head that is over 3/8" long so it wont' make you a coat that will keep you warm!
33
posted on
04/10/2004 9:16:58 PM PDT
by
dalereed
(,)
To: Pikamax
This is sickening. These babies don't have a chance to get away - this is not a hunt it's a mass slaughter. Those poor little baby seals just lay there and get slaughtered.
34
posted on
04/12/2004 8:54:10 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: annyokie
35
posted on
04/12/2004 8:55:48 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: areafiftyone
I agree. It is repulsive and disgusting.
36
posted on
04/12/2004 8:56:17 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: dalereed
Like to try it anyhow just to see
37
posted on
04/12/2004 9:02:17 AM PDT
by
paul51
To: drhogan
it seems to me that killing unborn children, US soldiers, AND baby harp seals is bad.Me too. The only difference is by degree. There is no honor in either three killings. What sort of man considers his income to be dependant on bashing in the skull of a seal? What sort of man considers his reduced chances for liberty and a just state by killing a US soldier? What sort of person justifies the easy killing of the innocent? The answer is that they don't consider at all.
38
posted on
04/12/2004 9:11:08 AM PDT
by
elbucko
To: elbucko
i really liked your post. you said it well.
all unnecessary killing raises serious moral issues about the perpetrator and his cheering squad, whether they are liberals, islamic terrorists, or freepers.
just because some types of kiling are worse (e.g., killing babies or soldiers) doesn't mean that other killing, if it is not necessary, is morally defensible. God said we are "stewards" of the creatures on earth, NOT slaughterers.
39
posted on
04/14/2004 12:01:04 PM PDT
by
drhogan
To: dalereed
well, maybe if you go out and hunt the baby seals, a polar bear will get you. polar bears don't discriminate against people with short hair. this way you could be doing something positive for nature.
40
posted on
04/14/2004 12:03:06 PM PDT
by
drhogan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson