To: sinkspur
"The polls prove it."
Then why are you in denial that W once had a 57%. Why is that number, derived at a particular point in time, any less valid than a number derived in the same manner by the same group today? Don't start parsing, just because you don't like the trend.
I think the trend & what it shows is valid. If you accept the current number - how can you dismiss the rest of the series? It's strickly a 'number(stat) thing'.
To: familyofman
If you accept the current number - how can you dismiss the rest of the series?Nobody was paying attention in December. More are paying attention now.
I don't see why you can't see that the numbers get more meaningful the closer to the election we get because more people are paying attention!
49 posted on
04/08/2004 6:35:11 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson