Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesnuffy
And there is a precedent: In Vietnam, the enemy wore us down, politically, physically, materially, economically and psychologically.

In Vietnam there was a Ho Chi Minh Trail from a secure (from ground attack) North Vietnam, which had borders with China (secure from any sort of attack). The fighters (mostly North Vietnamese Army) in South Vietnam had a supply line of Chinese and Russian arms. They enjoyed secure refuges in Cambodia and Laos. Johnson and to a lesser extent Nixon forced our commanders to fight the war with one hand tied behind the back.

In Iraq, there are some stockpiles of weapons and ammo from the Saddam days. There is no supply line. There are no secure refuges. The level of intensity we see now is unsustainable. And this time we aren't looking to negotiate with the terrorists.

28 posted on 04/07/2004 6:30:17 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Your supposed supply line issue doesn't seem to worry the Chechens though does it? Besides, Iraq has not one but two 'Chinas'. Iran and Syria.
31 posted on 04/07/2004 8:18:24 AM PDT by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson