[King Prout]

those are derivative, supplemental, supportive EFFECTS of sex, not the FUNCTION of sex.

let's apply your "logic" to something else as equally obvious: you would say that because an eye which has a shard of glass driven into the cornea (ie: abuse or misuse) reports agony to the brain, sets off a cascade of hormones and neurotransmitters, affects demeanor and personality, and so forth and so on... that the biological function of an eye is not to focus light onto the retina, translate photon reception into chemical signals, and report this data to the occipital lobes.

*twirling finger at right temple at such "reasoning"*

[theFIRMbss]

>let's apply your "logic" to ... an eye which has a shard of glass driven into the cornea ... *twirling finger at right temple at such "reasoning"*

So, you're comparing the normal effects of sex to random trauma . . . Let's deal: I'll admit I'm wacky, if you admit that you're Forest Gump . . .