To: kcvl
This woman is not looking out for anyone but herself. She is a selfish, ego-centered, red diaper doper crybaby who is looking for a reason why her children turned out better than she did. She stands for nothing. And she falls for anything, except the truth. She feels the the truth is variable and only relates to HER. She has no sense of right or wrong. Luckily her son did not pick up this deficit.
116 posted on
04/03/2004 7:08:01 AM PST by
longun45
(The chickens are coming home to roost, as it were.)
To: longun45
I agree.
I'm not disputing that she loves her son, but it's a selfish love that, as someone said previously, is projecting her own ideals onto her children.
At the end of the article, it said "But she knows they'll eventually understand each other; they're mother and child." To me, that translates as "I'm his mother, he's my child, so he'll eventually come around and do what he's supposed to."
She doesn't want to understand his way of thinking; she wants him to see things her way.
To: longun45
Liberals continue to claim that they support their troops by demanding that "they come home NOW!" but they really want to see America fail in Iraq. If we leave now, WE, the United States will be embarrased and we would hand a huge victory to Al-Qaida, the Islamofacists and ALL the pinko pansy commie socialist liberals. This woman doesn't care about her son at all. I am proud of him for turning out better than his red diaper doper baby mom.
152 posted on
04/03/2004 9:55:07 AM PST by
Chinese_American_Patriot
(9/11/01 - Never Forget, NEVER Forgive!!!! Al-Fallujah, home of savages!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson