[Hildy]

How is this different than the Muslim woman who wouldn't take her veil off for her driver's license?

[Right_in_Virginia]

How is this different than the Muslim woman who wouldn't take her veil off for her driver's license?

I'd like to know the answer to your question, too.

[Oztrich Boy]

How is this different than the Muslim woman who wouldn't take her veil off for her driver's license?

How it's not different: Any Amish who wants a driver's licence has to be photographed.

[festus]

Its differnet because if the Amish had folks in their religion that wanted to blow up things they would either turn them over to the authorities or hang them on their own.

I would not wish to treat Islam as a seperate threat and at a differnet level than other religions if I saw one single shred of evidence that the members of the mosques were turning in the extremists. But they aren't. The reason is plain as the Koran. The Koran teaches clearly that it is the duty of the Muslim in todays world to phsically attack the Christian Jew and Infidel "until they pay tribute out of hand". Now you'll find folks claiming that the Koran doesn't really teach that. These are just apologists for the terrorist and those who harbor them.

We know the profile of the terrorists and shoudln't waste time harrasing the Amish.

True not all muslims are terrorists and its probably true only a small number are. But until they police themselves we should focus on them and let the Amish alone.