Actually, your post is a classic. I say that because of the following: (1) it's linked to post #1, thus you have reacted to the article only, and perhaps only to the title of the article, in a thread which is over 400 posts long; (2) you claim that the article is "jumping to conclusions," but you don't say what's wrong with it, nor do you provide your own conclusions, if you have any; (3) you mention "the church of Evolution," which -- although you probably don't understand why -- disqualifies you from serious participation in a debate on a science topic; (4) you vaguely mention "a certain pigs tooth," thus saying ... well, just what are you saying? Yes indeed, your post is a classic.