Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Who is John Galt?
Well, let's all keep working for 100%.

Nobody but congress passes laws, and in a state nobody but legislature passes laws. It's much less of a stretch to equate them than to try to differentiate them.
I've never seen any contemporary indication that "congress" is in there for more than emphasis so as an "originalist" I'm happy with them applying it to the states.

It's just their arbitrary interpretation of the First- and of everything else- that earns them my contempt.

100 posted on 04/02/2004 7:07:27 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
The debate over the amendment centered around the Barron ruling and it was even expressly stated that it's purpose was...

I've never seen any contemporary indication that "congress" is in there for more than emphasis...

If we consider 'original intent,' it would appear that State secession was also entirely constitutional (as per the specific written terms of the ratification documents of New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia). Something which, by the way, I would not dispute...

;>)

103 posted on 04/02/2004 7:21:04 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("No political relation can subsist between the assenting and dissenting States.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson