[Cowgirl]

I am only for teaching science that does not include lies, of which the text books are full. They must lie in order to have something to prove evolution. I have no problem with showing truth that is known, not theory that is ridiculous. A bird can adapt to a climate or be bred to look quite different than what it started out to be, but it will still be a bird. If there were no dinosaurs ever present a few thousand years ago, why do
caves have pictures of dinosaurs drawn by american Indians before the white man ever showed up. There are many such
evidences of man living with dinosaurs, but they were called dragons. The word dinosaur did not exist then. Why does written history take us back to a maximum of 10,000 years but the only evidence for prehistoric times
is a few fossils supposedly dated by the layers. The
earth is winding down, it is not evolving. You have not
studied creationism if you think there is no evidence for
a different theory than the lying evolutionists.

[Stultis]

A bird can adapt to a climate or be bred to look quite different than what it started out to be, but it will still be a bird.

So, are you suggesting that "birds" might comprise a "created kind"? And yet still claiming that macroevolution is nonesense? The differences between, say, a falcon, an ostrich, a penguin and a pelican are microevolutionary? This would be an exceedingly bizarre notion of microevolution!