Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
The point is a fake is a fake no matter what you want to call it.
103 posted on 04/06/2004 10:30:14 AM PDT by Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Cowgirl
The point is a fake is a fake no matter what you want to call it.

The important point is that creationist argument is hit and run. You might ask a legitimate question -- and the possibility of forgery is legitimate -- but then you run away before anyone can answer. sometimes the answers are hard to find and take time.

Here's a link to some answers.

Here's something to chew on:

...the Eichstatt specimen has clear feather impressions (Wellnhofer 1974) and the Maxberg specimen has impressions in which the structure of the feather is discernable as being typical of that in modern birds (de Beer 1954; von Heller 1959; Charig et al. 1986). Not only that, the feathers of the Maxberg specimen clearly refute any possibility of forgery because they continue under the bones of the skeleton and are overlain by dendrites ...

105 posted on 04/06/2004 11:14:37 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson