[HostileTerritory]

Yes, but only within the framework of the current decision and the current consistitution. That's why we're moving to a constitutional amendment. An amendment enacting civil unions would trump the court's decision.

We're going to have same-sex couples marrying for two and a half years before any amendment could come into effect, is the problem.

[Old Professer]

I'll count on you to keep us posted.

[HostileTerritory]

Civil unions passed, 105-92. Legislature votes next year and then it's on the ballot. We're done for 2004.

[HostileTerritory]

Civil unions passed, 105-92. Legislature votes next year and then it's on the ballot. We're done for 2004.

[BikerNYC]

We're going to have same-sex couples marrying for two and a half years before any amendment could come into effect, is the problem.

This will be the interesting part. What do you think the practical consequences of this will be?