To: Eva
Ijaz has backed totally off his assertion that Sudan offered clinton OBL. He is now saying that the CIA or FBI probably did not convey that information to the executive branch because they disliked each other so much.
Guess we are going to have NOT believe our lying ears.......clinton saying that the reason he did not take OBL was because we didn't have a legal reason to hold him....just never ever happened.
70 posted on
03/28/2004 4:21:34 PM PST by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: OldFriend
clinton saying that the reason he did not take OBL was because we didn't have a legal reason to hold him....just never ever happened. Maybe something as good or even better though - apparently Janet Reno had the CIA present Masoud (Northern Alliance) with a list or rules under which he could "legally" catch or kill UBL ... still under seal of 9/11 commission based on commenting that happened between the lines during Sandy Berger testimony.
To: OldFriend
Well .. I didn't get that impression at all - all Ijaz said was it was "a possibility" Clinton never knew - however, Clinton has admitted he knew about OBL being offered by Sudan.
496 posted on
03/28/2004 9:39:13 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson