Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
Ijaz has backed totally off his assertion that Sudan offered clinton OBL. He is now saying that the CIA or FBI probably did not convey that information to the executive branch because they disliked each other so much.

Guess we are going to have NOT believe our lying ears.......clinton saying that the reason he did not take OBL was because we didn't have a legal reason to hold him....just never ever happened.

70 posted on 03/28/2004 4:21:34 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: OldFriend
clinton saying that the reason he did not take OBL was because we didn't have a legal reason to hold him....just never ever happened.

Maybe something as good or even better though - apparently Janet Reno had the CIA present Masoud (Northern Alliance) with a list or rules under which he could "legally" catch or kill UBL ... still under seal of 9/11 commission based on commenting that happened between the lines during Sandy Berger testimony.

476 posted on 03/28/2004 8:15:57 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend
Well .. I didn't get that impression at all - all Ijaz said was it was "a possibility" Clinton never knew - however, Clinton has admitted he knew about OBL being offered by Sudan.
496 posted on 03/28/2004 9:39:13 PM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson