To: onyx; ALOHA RONNIE; rave123
It was a full-out and OBVIOUS hatchet job on Condi Rice. Then why did Rice consent to the interview?
Are we all this naive?
Do we think Rice is such a spectacular speaker? Are we so disconnected that we think just by speaking the truth people will hear the truth?
Rice's weak, cut, spliced, hatcheted, poorly-lit and truncated interview should come as no surprise.
Dems: two months.
Repubs: 20 minutes.
Memo to White House -- "SNAP OUT OF IT!
When you have the ball, you're supposed to stop playing defense and switch to offense. Immediately.
557 posted on
03/29/2004 10:02:08 AM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
What are you implying? That she knew she would be set up, so why go there?
563 posted on
03/29/2004 10:40:17 AM PST by
rave123
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Do we think Rice is such a spectacular speaker?
Don't know about you, but yes, I think she's a fabulous speaker.
One mistake: she should have insisted on NO EDITING.
567 posted on
03/29/2004 11:25:07 AM PST by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson