As a result of reduced death rates, there are more people in their non-productive years than ever before. More children and more elderly people unable to participate in the world's work force increase the burden on the productive age group. [...] The National Academy of Sciences has said:
Either the birth rate must go back down or the death rate must go back up.I'm hopeful these words put into better perspective the candy-coated Pill most "Educated" and "Liberated" sorts swallowed so willingly.
Death tolls have been reduced in every country to negligible rates from epidemics and diseases such as malaria, measles, smallpox, cholera, polio and tuberculosis; major advances have been made against heart disease and cancer, artificial organs can now prolong life.Since we accept these intrusions into nature's control of population as morally justified, are we not unwise to consider birth control with equal moral justificiation?
If we continue to support government activities to reduce disease and improve health in order to prolong life under the auspices of what is good for society, then should we not consider birth control as a government activity for similar reasons?
The utter disregard for pursuing the pharmas and recognizing ALL victims -- particularly hemophiliacs -- as opposed to capitalizing on shrieking homosexuals only too stupid as to DEMAND monies for the very pharmas who pumped them full of contaminated Hep-B vaccine in the first place. (Hepatitis being a fairly common occurence among homosexuals.)
My heart aches for you. As it does many who've been affected by the Blood Scandal. And you put me in mind of two brothers (one dead by the time their case came to trial) whose win in court was summarily overturned by the bench.
Unbelievable, really. But one sort of expects that sort of cronyism and protection in a state where Angola Prison bled prisoners like cattle and pumped tainted product through Canada through 1994.