[cyncooper]

I found an article by Sidney Blumenthal on Salon yesterday (I did link it on another thread). In it he argues that Clarke has "unimpeachable credibility" and says a person can't call Clarke a partisan because he voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.

So we know he voted McCain. I'll guess in that effort the dems made to vote McCain and oust Bush as the nominee.

Anyway, that is the sum total of proof Clarke and his supporters (when Blumenthal's involved you KNOW we're in the stinky stuff) offer to show he is not a partisan. In other words, their own "proof" makes the opposite case.

[Mo1]

I found an article by Sidney Blumenthal on Salon yesterday (I did link it on another thread). In it he argues that Clarke has "unimpeachable credibility" and says a person can't call Clarke a partisan because he voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.

Here is the article

the Bush administration has launched a full-scale offensive against him: impugning his personal motives, claiming he is a disappointed job-hunter, that he is publicity mad, a political partisan (Clarke, in fact, voted for Republican Sen. John McCain for president in the Republican primaries in 2000) -- as well as ignorant, irrelevant and a liar

On a side note .. did you happen to notice at the DNC love fest fundraiser the other night .... How Clinton kept referring to John McCain ... and the 2000 primary between McCain and Bush

They seem to be using using McCain name a lot these days

[CyberAnt]

And .. if Blumenthal's involved - this is a HILLARY PLAN GONE TERRIBLY WRONG.