To: GeronL
indeed it would.
runs on literal "impulse" power.
about the size of a WW2 battleship.
able to carry a couple or three dozen astronauts.
able to round trip to mars in 145 days.
able to carry a small launch space shuttle of it's own.
a massive payload in the 100,000 pounds range.
less expensive to launch and maintain than the shuttle.
if we could just find a way to do the nuclear thing, without upsetting the enviralwhackos...
Am I right about it's capacity as reported in the articles?
26 posted on
03/24/2004 8:41:45 PM PST by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: Robert_Paulson2
I think so. How would it slow down?? Another nuke??
27 posted on
03/24/2004 8:45:00 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: Robert_Paulson2
With a 3 foot hull, those inside would be much much safer than in a shuttle.
28 posted on
03/24/2004 8:45:42 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
To: Robert_Paulson2
Am I right about it's capacity as reported in the articles? That was the vision in 1960. Today I think we could do much, much better.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson