To: Cboldt
That's okay. From what Rep. Dreier said on FNC this morning, Clarke's latest version also differs from the testimony he's given various intell committees. Anyone mentioned that little tidbit?
To: mewzilla
One of the Republican questioners pointed out to Clarke that the book differs greatly from his testimony...Clarke said that he just wasn't asked the right questions. (!)
2,623 posted on
03/24/2004 1:24:31 PM PST by
GOPrincess
(Jim Angle...My Hero!!)
To: mewzilla
That's okay. From what Rep. Dreier said on FNC this morning, Clarke's latest version also differs from the testimony he's given various intell committees. Anyone mentioned that little tidbit?Neither Clarke or the panel brought that up.
2,629 posted on
03/24/2004 1:25:27 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: mewzilla
Senator Saxby Chambliss was on Fox & friends this morning questioning why Richard Clarke-Kent's testimony before the Intelligence committee differed so much from his book.
The 911 Panel member Lehman also brought it up during his questioning of Clarke-Kent's credibility.
2,641 posted on
03/24/2004 1:27:18 PM PST by
Republican Red
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
To: mewzilla
Cavuto had Saxby Chamblis on and he basically said the same thing. Clarke testified before their committee, and it was totally different from what Clarke said today.
Also .. I hear there is a Wash Post article out which says that Clarke gave a briefing sometime in 1999, making a connection between Saddam (Iraq) and Al Queda (Ben Ladin) .. which Clarke now says didn't exist.
3,062 posted on
03/24/2004 5:08:59 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson