To: Oldeconomybuyer
As if Clarke did not betray the background on national security meeting.
This is war, and we have some of our own smearing to do.
To: roses of sharon
As if Clarke did not betray the background on national security meeting. Absolutely!
2,299 posted on
03/24/2004 12:38:07 PM PST by
Howlin
(It's another good day to be a Republican!)
To: roses of sharon
Wow, did he just basically say that all his dire charges in his new book boil down to "emphasis and tone," and that his August '02 defense of the Bush Admin was
not deceptive in substance?!
(Not that the press will notice.)
To: roses of sharon
This is war, and we have some of our own smearing to do.
Agree, totally, and our side had better gird for battle.
If this hearing is any indication, we are in trouble.
2,356 posted on
03/24/2004 12:44:30 PM PST by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson