Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
It was a briefing on behalf of the Whhite House. The White House gave permission to release it. They broke no ethics code. Clarke and Kerrey apparently think that those briefings are their personal property. They are wrong.
2,260 posted on 03/24/2004 12:34:34 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2229 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
You are totally correct, IMO.
2,266 posted on 03/24/2004 12:35:14 PM PST by coloradomom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2260 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
I will drop this subject, but I have to disagree here.

If anybody can name me one example ever of a network releasing a background interview like this, I would like to hear about it.

What you are saying now is that if Stephanopholous gave a background interview on behalf of Clinton, then bashed Clinton, Clinton has the authorization to order it released?

It's ethically wrong IMHO.

2,300 posted on 03/24/2004 12:38:10 PM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2260 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple; dogbyte12
Shep Smith just said they will speak with Jim Angle shortly about the charge of unethical.

I need to leave for a bit. Please somebody watch Fox to see if this comes up and let us know what they say.
2,397 posted on 03/24/2004 12:47:56 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson