Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaida No. 2: We Have Briefcase Nukes
MYWAY.COM? ^ | Mar. 21, 2004 | MyWay.com?

Posted on 03/21/2004 4:15:57 PM PST by BenLurkin

SYDNEY, Australia (AP) - Osama bin Laden's terror network claims to have bought ready-made nuclear weapons on the black market in central Asia, the biographer of al-Qaida's No. 2 leader was quoted as telling an Australian television station.

In an interview scheduled to be televised on Monday, Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir said Ayman al-Zawahri claimed that "smart briefcase bombs" were available on the black market. It was not clear when the interview between Mir and al-Zawahri took place.

U.S. intelligence agencies have long believed that al-Qaida attempted to acquire a nuclear device on the black market, but say there is no evidence it was successful.

In the interview with Australian Broadcasting Corp. television, parts of which were released Sunday, Mir recalled telling al-Zawahri it was difficult to believe that al-Qaida had nuclear weapons when the terror network didn't have the equipment to maintain or use them.

"Dr Ayman al-Zawahri laughed and he said 'Mr. Mir, if you have $30 million, go to the black market in central Asia, contact any disgruntled Soviet scientist, and a lot of ... smart briefcase bombs are available,'" Mir said in the interview.

"They have contacted us, we sent our people to Moscow, to Tashkent, to other central Asian states and they negotiated, and we purchased some suitcase bombs," Mir quoted al-Zawahri as saying.

Al-Qaida has never hidden its interest in acquiring nuclear weapons.

The U.S. federal indictment of bin Laden charges that as far back as 1992 he "and others known and unknown, made efforts to obtain the components of nuclear weapons."

Bin Laden, in a November 2001 interview with a Pakistani journalist, boasted having hidden such components "as a deterrent." And in 1998, a Russian nuclear weapons design expert was investigated for allegedly working with bin Laden's Taliban allies.

It was revealed last month that Pakistan's top nuclear scientist had sold sensitive equipment and nuclear technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea, fueling fears the information could have also fallen into the hands of terrorists.

Earlier, Mir told Australian media that al-Zawahri also claimed to have visited Australia to recruit militants and collect funds.

"In those days, in early 1996, he was on a mission to organize his network all over the world," Mir was quoted as saying. "He told me he stopped for a while in Darwin (in northern Australia), he was ... looking for help and collecting funds."

Australia's Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the government could not rule out the possibility that al-Zawahri visited Australia in the 1990s under a different name.

"Under his own name or any known alias he hasn't traveled to Australia," Ruddock told reporters Saturday. "That doesn't mean to say that he may not have come under some other false documentation, or some other alias that's not known to us."

Mir describe al-Zawahri as "the real brain behind Osama bin Laden."

"He is the real strategist, Osama bin Laden is only a front man," Mir was quoted as saying during the interview. "I think he is more dangerous than bin Laden."

Al-Zawahri - an Egyptian surgeon - is believed to be hiding in the rugged region around the Pakistan-Afghan border where U.S. and Pakistani troops are conducting a major operation against Taliban and al-Qaida forces.

He is said to have played a leading role in orchestrating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedanukes; alzawahri; briefcasenukes

1 posted on 03/21/2004 4:15:58 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The safest place to be will probably be Boston during the democrat convention.
2 posted on 03/21/2004 4:17:30 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Wait a minute, first it was suitcase nukes, now it's briefcase nukes. What's next, ladies' handbag nukes?
3 posted on 03/21/2004 4:18:26 PM PST by squidly (I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Louis Vuitton perhaps?
4 posted on 03/21/2004 4:20:27 PM PST by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Another safe place will be in an airport. They will be afraid to racially profile a muslim, while some WWII medal of honor winner or an old grandmother will get an electron microscope inspection.
5 posted on 03/21/2004 4:22:23 PM PST by Enterprise ("Do you know who I am?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joonbug
Clutch Nukes, or the much feared CPN's
(change purse nukes)
6 posted on 03/21/2004 4:25:34 PM PST by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
BROKAW: Where has the exaggeration been in the threat on terrorism?

KERRY: Well, 45 minutes deployment of weapons of mass destruction, number one.

Aerial vehicles to be able to deliver materials of mass destruction, number two.

I mean, I -- nuclear weapons, number three.

I could run a long list of clear misleading, clear exaggeration. The linkage to Al Qaida, number four.

That said, they are really misleading all of America, Tom, in a profound way. The war on terror is less -- it is occasionally military, and it will be, and it will continue to be for a long time. And we will need the best-trained and the most well-equipped and the most capable military, such as we have today.

7 posted on 03/21/2004 4:26:43 PM PST by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calljack
Keychain nukes!
8 posted on 03/21/2004 4:38:17 PM PST by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against John Kerry, proud to be a "crook" and a "liar.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Nobody's gonna mistake you for BenSearchin
9 posted on 03/21/2004 4:38:34 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
They have briefcase briefs if the truth be known, hot air blowing BS.
10 posted on 03/21/2004 4:38:58 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
There are two types of terrorists: those that have nukes and those that talk about it.
11 posted on 03/21/2004 4:40:48 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
If they have 'em, they should smoke 'em. If they detonated one on American soil, the entire U.S. government couldn't stop what the American people would do next.
12 posted on 03/21/2004 4:43:29 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
Hatpin nukes!
13 posted on 03/21/2004 5:12:24 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Likely wishful thinking on their part. Even if they managed to obtain Russian suitcase nukes, these weapons have not been maintained and their tritium components are likely no longer functional. However, even a nuclear fizzle could spread deadly plutonium.

I still maintain that it should be clearly stated US policy that the use of nukes, chemical or biological weapons on US soil would bring a full retaliation using all US assets up to and including nuclear weapons aimed at BOTH the perpetrators AND any nation that aided or abetted them in this action. Attention, Pakistan, Iran and N. Korea--this nuke is for you. For good measure I think one large ICBM should be publically targeted at Mecca.

14 posted on 03/21/2004 5:18:12 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Wait a minute, first it was suitcase nukes, now it's briefcase nukes. What's next, ladies' handbag nukes?

While I do not doubt there may be components for making small nuclear warheads, the technology for making such warheads requires a supply of tritium to use in the trigger. That means the ability of al-Qaeda (or any other nongovernmental organization) to use the nuclear devices without the help of a nuclear-capable government is pretty low and decreases with time as tritium has a rather short halflife (about 4.2 years). My other reason for believing al-Queda does not have nuclear weapons is that those zealots would have used one or more if they had many in working condition. After all, their goal is to kill as many of us "infidels" as possible.

I suspect they may have components which they could use to make a radiological weapon.

15 posted on 03/21/2004 5:38:44 PM PST by Thor_Hammar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
That is humorous. My hat is off to you.

My I point out, even if it be to no avail, that the titles are NOT identical. ("a" very small difference, but computers are so darn literal.)

My search (yes I did one) was run on this title.

16 posted on 03/21/2004 5:57:45 PM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Wait a minute, first it was suitcase nukes, now it's briefcase nukes. What's next, ladies' handbag nukes?

CandyGram Nukes!

17 posted on 03/21/2004 6:10:47 PM PST by Grim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I'm glad you took my comment in the spirit with which it was intended.

I know that FR's search tool can be a bit quirky at times.

18 posted on 03/21/2004 6:42:51 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson