To: cyborg
Not at all.
But Toyota pissed off the Unions by setting up their assembly plants in right to work States, thus making it nearly impossible for Unions to organize.
43 posted on
03/20/2004 7:57:14 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
No wonder why Toyota is just about the best besides Honda... right to work!
44 posted on
03/20/2004 8:02:24 AM PST by
cyborg
(In die begin het God die hemel en die aarde geskape.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
"But Toyota pissed off the Unions by setting up their assembly plants in right to work States, thus making it nearly impossible for Unions to organize."
So what about me? I decide to buy an American built Honda auto.
Should I feel well served, by the vehicle's lower cost to me, due to lower non-union wage costs?
Or should I want to pay more, for some social "benefit" of having union workers?
What is the benefit to the consumer, of paying more for products, because of higher wage costs?
What justifies a union worker being paid more? Is he more "qualified?"
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson