Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elkiejg
Kennedy spokesman David Smith declined to comment on the memo, saying, "I don't feel the need to comment on a stolen memo that I don't even know the senator saw."

"I don't want to comment on stolen materials," (University of Chicago's) Mr. Sunstein said.

Reading from the same talking points, fellas? This is a good piece which *OUGHT* to spark massive outrage, alas it'll be swept aside.

4 posted on 03/19/2004 4:14:29 AM PST by newzjunkey (No to Boxer. No to Kerry. No to defacto Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
Yeah, I'm sure they refused to look at the stolen Pentagon Papers too, right?
8 posted on 03/19/2004 4:18:33 AM PST by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
While they won't comment on the information in the memo they are very quick to reveal they were stolen when all I remember ever hearing is Republican snooping into Democrats' memos.
12 posted on 03/19/2004 4:31:11 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey
"Even if there is something bad in there, it would be improper of me -- and possibly of you -- to comment on them."


Yes, but here is the gravy in their script.
15 posted on 03/19/2004 4:32:30 AM PST by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson