Replies

“There are many forces driving a desire to redefine humanity. There are many apparent goods to be obtained, from the elimination of genetic defects to the cure of a whole host of diseases through embryonic stem cell manipulation. However, in all of our discussion about human nature, we must never succumb to the objectification or commodification of persons. We cannot allow the cold calculus of utilitarianism [to] influence our inherent, intrinsic understanding of who and what we are…This age of moral confusion cries out for a reaffirmation of that which makes human beings unique and worthy. Such ‘metaphysical pretensions’ are not preposterous, as Ayn Rand would have us believe, but are the only basis for human dignity.”

A redefinition of humanity, in order to facilitate utilitarian purposes??? Why, yes -- we see that going on all around us these days, courtesy of the progressive Left and their epigones. They argue we can't let little things like human dignity and sanctity stand in the way of Progress, dontcha know!!! And some people are more "equal" than others -- as Napoleon (as I recall) pointed out in George Orwell's Animal Farm.

Translation: To progressive leftists and many secularists, a pregnant woman has unlimited rights, and her preborn child exactly none. This is what passes for justice these days....

Yet, to "commodify" a child, or any other person for that matter, at any stage of life, is to sin against both God and nature. Human beings are ends in themselves, not means to ends that serve the interests of the powerful.

Justice and truth stand eternally; they are not of human origin. Man can try to displace or redefine them; but all his efforts will be in vain. Who does not stand for Life runs the risk of the second death.... Or so it seems to me. Pace, Ms. Rand.

Thanks so much, Marvin, for the ping to this excellent article.