To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
An actual attack that shut down or postponed a national election would have to be one heck of an attack.
OTOH, a mere rumor of an anthrax attack at a polling place may be sufficient in spreading panic and reducing participation, and the government would not respond quickly enough to matter. Of course, our media outlets would have to cooperate with the terrorists- no way would they do that to oust Bush.
16 posted on
03/15/2004 6:33:18 PM PST by
DBrow
To: DBrow
"An actual attack that shut down or postponed a national election would have to be one heck of an attack." IMO, whenever (not if ever) Al Qaeda gets a working nuke, they'll make plans to set it off in the USA. Without hesitation. The only way to make sure of preventing such a thing is to eradicate Al Qaeda and the rest of the terrorist gangs, along with the countries that provide them support.
Bush gets this, I believe. I think middle America may have decided it could be more fun to put its head in the sand. I hope not, but we'll see.
66 posted on
03/15/2004 7:32:28 PM PST by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson