Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
A poster starts an activsm thread where he's encouraging people to take action and speak out against the liberal biased media and Democrat lying and you come in and splat a big old Democrat talking point propaganda turd smack dab into the middle of the thread.

The thread specificly addressed the issue of domestic job creation.
I expressed my opinion on the issue, backed up with links to articles that supported my position.
As a conservative, there is absolutely no way on God's Green Earth that I would ever support Kerry or any other Democrat for the presidency.
But I also think it extremely sad that the Administration's policies are so pathetic and indefensible that you have to resort to a lame rebuttle about "Democrat talking point propaganda turds".

What it boils down to is that neither Kerry nor Bush have viable policies to stimulate domestic business, industries and resultant domestic job creation.

1,110 posted on 03/15/2004 11:28:32 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
LOL. Right. And your "conservative" points are straight out of the democrat union manual. Oops, that's right. You're a Buchananite Union kinda guy. Union protectionism is your thing. So what else is new?
1,116 posted on 03/15/2004 11:34:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
What it boils down to is that neither Kerry nor Bush have viable policies to stimulate domestic business, industries and resultant domestic job creation.

Sad that you think it requires them, Congress, and policies to do the job of the free market for itself.

The only viable program for government is to get out of the damn way, stop regulating business to death, stop forcing high costs on operations through taxation, minimum wages, unemployement insurance, ridiculous workman's comp laws etc., and stop frivolous lawsuits that are more designed for social change and not justice.

You sound no different than a typical cherry picker...pick this industry over that industry. Protect steel workers? Sounds good until companies that use steel go out of business. Protect sugar manufactures? Why not? Who cares if 20,000 candy making jobs go to Canada, not because of high labor costs imposed by government regulation, but high sugar costs!

Also, the vast majority of manufacturing jobs across the country are not the $20-50 an hour, unionized jobs for life you love...they are basically $10-12 an hour routine jobs putting gromments in holes. But you are willing to have "policies" to "protect" those jobs for some reason while at the same time saying every $10-12 an hour job at Wal-Mart is fueling the sixth level of hell.

You have no economic perspective. But at least you wouldn't vote for Kerry. Too bad the vast majority of those wonderful, unionized mid-manufacturing job workers will in key states like Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

While the happy, non-union employees of the Nissan and Mercedes plants in the South vote for Bush. Look at the demographics...that old Midwestern manufacturing, heavily unionized, Eastern European decendant worker is dying out and fading away.

That's one reason Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, and New York lost representation (and electoral votes) in the 2000 census.

You want government policies but like to ignore the damage of collective bargaining and union BS in caring only about an increasing wage with no regards for increasing productivity or efficiency. It's almost like tenure when you can't fire an incompetent factory worker.

1,132 posted on 03/15/2004 11:48:07 PM PST by Fledermaus (Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
The thread specificly addressed the issue of domestic job creation.

No, the thread was an "action thread" with a call to action. Your comment, while certainly valid, should not have been posted on a thread that was intended to create activism, not for discussion purposes.

The moral of the story is to not pee on other peoples parades. That comment would have been fine on a thread which was a discussion about job creation/job loss.

I see Jim's point, but you probably won't see his. If the comment is not appropriate for the thread, it shouldn't be kept on the thread distracting from the stated purpose of the thread.

What was your motivation? To keep people from being involved? IMO, if you post that comment on a news story about job loss/job creation, it stays. If you post it on a "action thread" it doesn't belong.
1,299 posted on 03/16/2004 7:38:57 AM PST by Texas2step (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green; Jim Robinson
What it boils down to is that neither Kerry nor Bush have viable policies to stimulate domestic business, industries and resultant domestic job creation.

And Buchanan or whichever third party loon du jour does?

1,384 posted on 03/16/2004 2:57:26 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson