Skip to comments.
Mars stuff
NASA ^
| 3/14/04
| Self
Posted on 03/14/2004 8:22:38 PM PST by Monty22

Look at those holes. Those are the 'berrys'.
Can a non-life berry even expel itself and go along its way. Especially with the strands we've seen holding them up. If a 'berry' can be pushed out naturally, how?
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: cambrianthenpoof; mars; marslifenowdead; space; taxdollarsatwork; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
03/14/2004 8:22:39 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
Have the rovers taken pictures of the flag the astronautes put up there yet?
2
posted on
03/14/2004 8:25:08 PM PST
by
al baby
(Hope I don't get into trouble for this)
To: al baby
hah hah..
Funny, aren't there any real scientific people on here that'll look?
3
posted on
03/14/2004 8:26:14 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
Wind and sand erosion.
4
posted on
03/14/2004 8:26:33 PM PST
by
Crazieman
To: Crazieman
In precise motion?
I've never seen utter pits on rocks like that ever. Impossible.
Not localized pits. Never.
5
posted on
03/14/2004 8:27:43 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
I have no idea what you're talking about.
6
posted on
03/14/2004 8:29:06 PM PST
by
Crazieman
To: Crazieman
Explain those pits and 'berry's..
All found on the same spot. Spherical berrys and lots of weird pits in rocks..
c'mon. There's no way that's natural.
7
posted on
03/14/2004 8:30:35 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
#1 The photograph is at an odd angle
#2 They're still investigating the berries, but the likeliest explanation is phenomena from the craters formation. Similar things have been seen on earth
#3 The berry-less areas of the ground are windblown. They are usually linear and follow the rock crevices.
(have to run to work now)
8
posted on
03/14/2004 8:33:33 PM PST
by
Crazieman
To: Monty22
Define natural. Mars is not Earth so what's 'natrual' isn't necessarily the same - jmo.
To: Born in a Rage
They'll be different. To me, 'natural' means non biological.
Look at the pics. Are they? I don't know.
10
posted on
03/14/2004 8:37:05 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
what the hell?
a scale reference'd be useful
11
posted on
03/14/2004 8:51:36 PM PST
by
King Prout
(MECCA ET MEDINA DELENDAE SUNT!)
To: King Prout
I don't have a scale actually, those are just raw pics.
Interesting though, that defies any natural 'pitting' action, I think.
12
posted on
03/14/2004 8:53:08 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
not at all.
what you call "pits" might be gas inclusions in porous rock, exposed by the ages of sandblasting by Mars' notorious coriolis storms.
or maybe not.
point is: don't get yer knickers in a twist so easily.
13
posted on
03/14/2004 8:55:33 PM PST
by
King Prout
(MECCA ET MEDINA DELENDAE SUNT!)
To: King Prout
I'm not, but that's the Opportunity site which we've seen the berrys laying around below these 'holes'.
My question is.. What can cause this? Is there any known rock abrasion that causes little holes like this at non-repeating spots?
I think not. If it's natural, it's a whole new natural process that Earth science can not begin to understand.
14
posted on
03/14/2004 8:57:23 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
All found on the same spot. Spherical berrys and lots of weird pits in rocks.. c'mon. There's no way that's natural. there are two natural possibilities: the 'blueberries' are oolites or tektites that are harder than the country rock and just weather out of it, OR... the holes are not from the berries at all, but contained soluble crystals that were dissolved away (halite in water, for instance), leaving the pits.
To: BlazingArizona
Can a mimilized-enviro thing explain these 'berrys' and the 'holes' in one statement?
I'd like to see a full understanding of natural chemical reactions of how this happens, without biology.
16
posted on
03/14/2004 8:59:39 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
sedimentary rock deposited by wing can have remarkable variations in content.
volcanic rock can have irregular gas pockets
both types, after being scoured, could produce a pitted surface of this kind.
that's one of the reasons i wanted a scale factor.
is this image microns across, meters, of kilometers?
17
posted on
03/14/2004 9:12:49 PM PST
by
King Prout
(MECCA ET MEDINA DELENDAE SUNT!)
To: King Prout
On the scale, I don't know, I believe the rocks are in the foot-wide width at most, I'm pretty sure with that. The scale is small. Those pits and the berrys are an inch wide I believe at most.
18
posted on
03/14/2004 9:19:24 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Monty22
THEN MY MONEY IS ON MINERAL OR GASSEOUS INCLUSIONS WHICH HAVE ERODED AT A DIFFERENT RATE THAN THE PARENT ROCK BODY.
capslok, sorry. not shouting.
19
posted on
03/14/2004 9:25:27 PM PST
by
King Prout
(MECCA ET MEDINA DELENDAE SUNT!)
To: King Prout
Jeez..
I am just wondering on what the berrys and holes are.
If it's natural, it's an amazing new avenue of geology.
If not, then for biology.
Either way, this is a huge deal.
20
posted on
03/14/2004 9:35:01 PM PST
by
Monty22
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson