Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nebullis
How can aynone call this education?

Critical analysis of assumptions that lead to questions such as "what is science, what is theory" may be relegated to higher education. (I personally resisted that, as I recall, already in kindergarten when I began the analyzing the problems in my thinking produced by the practical necessity of adopting assumptions uncritically).

Still, benchmarks or outcomes are not simply pedagogical decisions. A political aspect becomes apparent when we see how the simple skill of reading has taken second place in elementary education. It is another example that somebody might hesitate to call education.

Odd thing, the methodology of criticism itself will eventually come under scrutiny when anybody is pressed to seriously decide what consitutes a legitimate challenge. Post-modern criticism of modernism has not been kind to the natural progress of anything. It negates. Not good for education. Of course, the idea that a quantitative benchmark such as the MOST evidence does have a practical, demotic appeal. With it the singular occurence is given short-rift--and easily relegated to the un-natural.

31 posted on 03/13/2004 1:39:31 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: cornelis
Critical analysis of assumptions that lead to questions such as "what is science, what is theory" may be relegated to higher education.

And beyond. Critical analysis is something that scientists engage in when doing science. This does not mean that it's something elementary educators and their students must do. Educating and learning at this level is not doing science, nor should it be.

35 posted on 03/13/2004 1:43:55 PM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis
Odd thing, the methodology of criticism itself will eventually come under scrutiny when anybody is pressed to seriously decide what consitutes a legitimate challenge.

One can always go deeper and question why we ever had the scientific revolution with its assumptions about what we can know about nature and wonder "Why not something else?" Possibly because it has led to such immediate successes in the gain of useful knowledge. Who knows? But there is always the opportunity for someone with completely different assumptions to start their own field.

39 posted on 03/13/2004 1:48:59 PM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson