[DannyTN]

"The author is obviously pure evil. "

Thanks for posting the whole article, but why is he evil? Is it...

1. He sides with the scientific establishment?
2. He teaches the scientific establishment line?
3. He exposes the propaganda techniques?
4. He admits that there is contradicting evidence?
5. He has reservations about using the propaganda techniques?
6. He wants his students to think critically?
7. He isn't displeased when his students reject his teachings?

   I suspect the only thing in that list that truly makes him evil is #1 and #2, but that evols will see him as evil for #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7

[js1138]

It's a joke, son. He is evil because he is truthful. You might notice, if you read the article, that he is teaching physics, not evolution, and he is not teaching he doesn't believe in. He is merely sad because there aren't enough hours in the day to deal with every possible objection. Like everything else in life, you have to make choices amomg possibilities. If you pause to smell every rose, you never ger anywhere.