[js1138]

It makes an implicit statement about the validity of evolution vs. other science and is clearly intended to confuse the student.

I thought about that, but then my experience on FR has taught me that those who challenge evolution seldom believe in physics, chemistry, astronomy or geology.

Perhaps it would be more productive to teach geology in hih school instead of biology.

[Nebullis]

Perhaps it would be more productive to teach geology in hih school instead of biology.

The creationist would have similar complaints about geology. Age of the earth, flood evidence, etc.

I facillate on the importance of teaching biology at the primary or secondary level. I recommend that students learn biolgy early because there is much to learn. But, on the other hand, we supplement our childrens' public education first with math. And a lot of it.

[VadeRetro]

Perhaps it would be more productive to teach geology in hih school instead of biology.

Too controversial! Geology is still evolution. So is the Big Bang. I know, because I once found a web page of "Questions for Evolutionists" and read about 10 questions before I found anything to do with biology.

[longshadow]

Perhaps it would be more productive to teach geology in hih school instead of biology.

They do; it's called "Earth Sciences" aka "Rocks for Jocks".....

;-)