Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
I am no expert at this, having only been assigned to nuclear missile battalions for a little over two years, but I believe the chance of an explosion being caused by a puncture of the nose cone is EXACTLY 0% though my guess might be somewhat high!
27 posted on 03/13/2004 9:57:44 AM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HoustonCurmudgeon
RE: Yours and earlier comments by others about could it have actually detonated as a result of the damage sustained.

Probably not.. in this case. The handling and laxity in enforcing standardized procedures is what bit here.

The potential for leakage of "dirty bomb"-like material may be exaggerated as well. But, one never knows these days,, and after the fact, were it to occur, it would be too late for those who are affected should a real catastrophe occur.

Thanks for your service, btw. ;-)
28 posted on 03/13/2004 10:03:50 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Support Our Troops! ... Thrash the demRats in November!!! ... Beat BoXer!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: HoustonCurmudgeon
The chances of one of the warheads detonating were near zero. Even the chances of one of the warheads being punctured and releasing radioactive material were near zero.

What I don't know is what were the chances the solid rocket fuel in the missile itself could have ignited. Any former missile guys with an answer?
44 posted on 03/14/2004 10:44:06 AM PST by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson