Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Jobs Crisis and the GOP
WND.com ^

Posted on 03/10/2004 7:16:16 AM PST by Theodore R.

The jobs crisis and the GOP

Posted: March 10, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

President Bush and his advisers are puzzled and worried.

Economic liftoff took place right on schedule in July when the tax cuts took effect. In the last six months of 2003, the economy blazed along on a growth path of 6 percent. But where are the jobs?

Last week's jobs report, with hundreds of thousands giving up the search for work, and manufacturing jobs disappearing for the 43rd straight month, jolted the White House. What is going on?

They're calling it a jobless recovery. Wrong. Millions of jobs are being created. They're just not being created here in the United States.

The reasons can be traced to these four acronyms: NAFTA, GATT, WTO, PNTR. These are the trade treaties and global institutions that have permitted the historic substitution of foreign labor for American labor, to the enrichment of the transnational companies that look upon the Congress as a wholly owned subsidiary.

Numbers do not lie. In 2003, America exported $1 trillion in goods and services. Almost 10 percent of GDP. Excellent. By the Clinton-Bush I rule – $1 billion in exports creates 20,000 jobs – that $1 trillion worth of exports created 20 million jobs. Exports are good for America.

The problem? We imported $1.5 trillion in goods and services. That created or supported 30 million jobs abroad. But even this understates the case. For foreign workers can be hired at a fraction of the cost of a U.S. worker. Our $1.5 trillion in imports is probably supporting 150,000,000 jobs abroad.

The U.S. trade deficit is the greatest foreign aid and wealth transfer program in history, and our workers are paying for it by the loss to their families of the American Dream.

Consider China. With some $150 billion in imports from China last year, we supported 3 million jobs there. But as China's wages are a tenth of U.S. wages, or less, we are probably talking about 30 million or 40 million jobs in China that are tied to exports to the United States.

For the Bush Republicans, the chickens are coming home to roost.

As Robert Novak reports, North Carolina welcomed Sen. John Edwards home after his unsuccessful campaign as a hero. Why? At the end, Edwards was a fiery adversary of the Bush-Clinton trade deals, a denunciator of NAFTA, a champion of workers. Indeed, just as almost all the Democrats ended up the campaign sounding like Howard Dean on Iraq, on trade they had all begun to sound like Dennis Kucinich.

North Carolina may now be in play in November, says Novak. If so, and Bush loses the Tarheel State, he loses the presidency.

At a weekend conference on immigration and jobs hosted by The American Cause, which this writer chairs, one speaker blurted out that while he voted for Bush in 2000, he would never do so again. The room erupted in applause, though virtually all there were conservatives, and all had once been Goldwater-Nixon-Reagan Republicans.

The crisis of the Bush dynasty is that, like the Bourbons of France, they have learned nothing and forgotten nothing. They do not understand that we have entered a new world where the old ways no longer work. They yet recite the old litanies that lost their relevance in the Reagan decade.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, and India abandoned state socialism, and China threw open its doors, a billion workers were thrown onto a global job market to compete against Americans who earn 10 and 20 times their wages.

The trade deals the U.S. government then negotiated, at the behest of U.S. corporations, were not really trade deals at all, but enabling acts. U.S. corporations were told: You can now shut your U.S. factories, shed your U.S. workers, build your new plants in Mexico, China and India, and bring your finished goods back to the United States, free of charge. Go for it!

As Paul Craig Roberts writes, what is happening is not "free trade" in the Adam Smith sense where Portugal makes wine and Britain makes textiles and ships. What is happening is the mass transfer of the "factors of production" from First World countries to Third World countries.

What is happening in the world is what happened in America after World War II, when factories moved to the Sun Belt in search of non-union labor that would work as hard for half of what the high-paid workers in the industrial heartland demanded and got.

Asia is the new Sun Belt, and America is fated to be the "Rust Belt" of the world, as China becomes the factory floor of the global economy and India, through outsourcing, its back office.

Republican free-trade dogma inhibits action to protect U.S. jobs. The GOP is hogtied and hamstrung by its ideology in dealing with the crisis. Its only response is to mutter with Dr. Pangloss that it is all for the best.

The GOP is fortunate its opponent in 2004 is John F. Kerry, who is as clueless as they are on the new world economy that has been designed, and is operating, to loot America of her patrimony.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bourbons; bush; china; edwards; foreignlabor; foreigntrade; gatt; joblessness; jobs; kerry; mobythread; nafta; nc; paulrobertsfreetrade; pntr; tradedeficit; wto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: KantianBurke
That's probably the silliest thing I've read on FR in quite some time.

Only if you're gullible or have no sense of humor. Chill out.

41 posted on 03/10/2004 8:13:24 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
Certainly.

Outsourcing is a tiny portion of jobs in reality. America is not an industrial economy anymore, but an information economy. That is why I am not being stupid and going into manufacturing. Times change. That isn't bad (unless our military production goes elsewhere....) America will adapt and survive as it always does.

Some of these doom and gloomers need to read Reagan's hope for a brighter future.

AND THAT is what Bush needs to hammer in the general election campaign starting in a month or so. He also needs to point out and hammer it when jobs are created. He needs to point out that the Dems have no actual plans to do anything to fix the problem.

42 posted on 03/10/2004 8:13:50 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
BoLS show 3 million jobs created.

How many of those are:
43 posted on 03/10/2004 8:14:21 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
Wake up and realize that this is not 1900; this is 2004.
44 posted on 03/10/2004 8:15:09 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The weather has been bad in much of the US the past couple of months, that depresses the job market I think. Weather is breaking, building will start up.

Our small town pop of 10,000 is in the process of getting a new Lowes, a new Wal-Greens, and another small business. It added a Perkins, a Lenny's sub shop, and a paint/flooring center last year. Just across the border in Miss they are adding 450 new jobs for a new FedX facility. Wal-mart is always very busy.

45 posted on 03/10/2004 8:16:52 AM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
That may not be enough. Joe Lunchbucket does not have the attention span for that. The argument will be outsourcing bas, GWB does nothing about it, GWB bad.
46 posted on 03/10/2004 8:18:39 AM PST by TXBSAFH (KILL-9 needs no justification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Can you prove that all the jobs lost were engineering jobs?

I'm an engineer. I am very lucky to have a job for the moment. If you merely go to the job search sites for engineering jobs, you would find that there are very few listings nationwide. Many of my friends have been without work for nearly two years. None of these jobs are "bubble computer", but rather hardcore embedded software engineering and circuit design. I have been in this field for over thirty years following five years in college. (Physics, math, electrical engineering, computer science. Computer science, not IT. I'm talking algorithms, operating systems internals, compiler design theory, queing theory, and so on.) The jobs are indeed evaporating.

The work done by myself and my friends is engineering in the full sense of the word. We use math, physics, chemistry, and other hardcore disciplines to accomplish our work. (I've never written a web page in my life.) I design hardware devices that contain microprocessors and write software for them as well. We are the guys that design and program cell phones, cable TV settop boxes, telephone switches, automobile systems controllers, PC Computers and related hardware, laboratory equipment, medical equipment, aircraft avionics, guided missle guts, air-traffic control systems, and so on.

If the bulk of America is making the same mistake you are in thinking that only "frivolous" computer jobs are affected, then I'm sure voters will simply not do the right thing. America's technological advantage will be squandered, surely enough. There just won't be any incintive to suffer though engineering school.

47 posted on 03/10/2004 8:20:55 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheGeezer
I suggest that everyone watch Lou Dobbs every night. He has a very informative show about outsourcing and fair trade issues regarding our economy (It's the only show I watch on CNN).

He has a great concern for where our economy is headed; the impact on workers and how cheap labor is the driving force.
48 posted on 03/10/2004 8:21:37 AM PST by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
You're right on!
49 posted on 03/10/2004 8:23:43 AM PST by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
An Engineering Degree is no more a guarantee of life-long employment than any other credential. Reality: deal with it

I was there at the end of the Apollo Program. The number of engineering jobs rose from that point in time. Only recently have engineering jobs become difficult to find.

You in in a Nation that is failing. Do something about it, or deal with it.

50 posted on 03/10/2004 8:24:51 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GailA
They did a feature on my hometown of 13,000 on the local news a couple months ago because it was one of the few places with a growing economy at the time. Unemployment was like 1.5 percent or something when it was 6 for the rest or the state or something like that. We are getting a Super Wal-Mart that will be opening soon and is bringing in a few jobs probably (most will just transfer from the old regular Wal-Mart). We have too many manufacturing plants to count for a small town....they are everywhere.

Our economy is just fine.
51 posted on 03/10/2004 8:27:07 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Keen-Minded
I have several friends who have been out of work and do not think highly of this administration.

What would your friends like the administrations to do? This is a serious question as I would like to here some of their ideas/suggestions.

52 posted on 03/10/2004 8:28:47 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
> this is the plan your leaders have for you

I totally agree with your analysis of why engineering is so important to the US, and have posted to this effect before. I also agree that the dreamers Clinton brought on did indeed want to work for a global power structure over the US (that they could then help run). But I am wondering if you are saying that G.W. Bush is in on this too -- can you prove it?
53 posted on 03/10/2004 8:29:08 AM PST by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
I am concerned about engineering jobs, but I am assuming this is a phase. If it continues, then it will be time to be worried. Dubya should have a plan to pound in the campaign anyway.
54 posted on 03/10/2004 8:29:38 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor
Probaly just give dum dum make work projects.
55 posted on 03/10/2004 8:29:43 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LS
bingo...you're right and I am amzed that the GOP isn't on this fact...I have worked for 2p0 years self employed....never been out of work,never been included in the "working" count
56 posted on 03/10/2004 8:32:00 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LS
bingo...you're right and I am amzed that the GOP isn't on this fact...I have worked for 20 years self employed....never been out of work,never been included in the "working" count
57 posted on 03/10/2004 8:32:07 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Unemployment rate is 5.6%. Hardly a crisis.

What is it in Germany, 11%?
58 posted on 03/10/2004 8:32:23 AM PST by petercooper (Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
many "outsourced" jobs are going from the rust belt, not overseas, but to the South here in the good old U.S. Most of the South is experiencing an economic boom as a result.

A union friend of mine who works in an Illinois steel plant, once told me he clocked in at 8:00am, starts working at 8:30am, then after a series of one hour and ten minute work spurts broken up by two 1 hour breaks, a long lunch hour, and quitting work at 3:30 [but not clocking out til 4:00pm]---it all added up to three and a half hours of work on an eight hour shift. And this high school grad was getting paid more than I was with a masters degree from college with much better insurance and other benefits. I was stunned. I asked him if it wouldn't mean more job security if the men on each shift worked harder and he casually replied, "maybe, but it might put someone else out of a job."

How long do, or did, American unions expect the above gravy train to last?
59 posted on 03/10/2004 8:33:41 AM PST by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor
The out of work do not know what they should do. But when they see GWB doing nothing or in their (and my) eye hurting us by signing more free trade treaties. It angers them to no end. Do you expect them to forget about being out of work when they vote in November?
60 posted on 03/10/2004 8:33:45 AM PST by TXBSAFH (KILL-9 needs no justification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson