Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
Not at all, I'll leave the assumptions to you folks. You seem to be doing an outstanding job with the innuendo and rumors from anonymous aides.
86 posted on 03/08/2004 11:54:34 PM PST by CWOJackson (What are you complaining about, she called me compassionate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: CWOJackson
Not at all, I'll leave the assumptions to you folks. You seem to be doing an outstanding job with the innuendo and rumors from anonymous aides.

You first assumed that there was no effort to pass a referendum-proof bill.

When that proved to be an incorrect assumption, you assumed that was a sticking point for Schwarzenegger. You have no evidence for that, named or anonymous, sourced or unsourced.

On the other hand there are quite a few links on this thread where Schwarzengger says he supports CDLs for Illegals and also says he is working with Cedillo on the new bill.

There is at this point no reason to believe Schwarzenegger wouldn't support SB 1160 if it contained an urgency statute.


92 posted on 03/09/2004 12:03:36 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson