I don't know...there are plenty of female collegues and classmates of mine who I am pretty sure that I can guarantee you that, even if I lived exclusively with them with no contact with any other females, I could not find myself being sexually attracted to them. I'd stick to the "self-gratification" method in that case.
But that is getting off topic. I think what my point in my original post was, is that I honestly do not see men defiling the (new gay-friendly) definition of marriage simply to get tax benefits. But then again, I may just be too trusting a character.
"do not see men defiling the (new gay-friendly) definition of marriage simply to get tax benefits"
It wouldnt happen immediately, but due to the "anything goes" culture that this kind of moral dilution encourages... over time it would become socially acceptable for 2 straight men to use it for economic benefits. After what we've seen in the last 40 years, tell me honestly that you don't see that happening in the next 20?