[Howlin]

I am at a loss about why some of these people, despite being told the facts of this case and the law, are still on here posting misinformation!

[Cboldt]

I am at a loss about why some of these people, despite being told the facts of this case and the law, are still on here posting misinformation!

SSDD. Information has a way of evolving, truth has a way of coming to the surface, and people who persistently post false or misleading ittems are damaging their own credibility.

[Bonaparte]

"I am at a loss about why some of these people, despite being told the facts of this case and the law, are still on here posting misinformation! "

Me too. It seems that a witches' brew of emotionalism and Peter Pan libertarianism is at play. Call your broker. Buy Kool-Aid.

On this thread, I've had my work cut out for me, just explaining the bare basics to the Martha lemmings. Things like case law, "constructive" knowledge, the legal force of SEC regs, the quasi-judicial status of the SEC, etc. are concepts unknown to these people.

[Cboldt]

Listening to O'Reilly on the radio, and a caller is expressing that Martha was not charged with the underlying ImClone sale based on inside information. Even O'Reilly didn't know the SEC has a pending civil case against Martha Stewart. Amazing.

Our media is truly defective.