Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qwinn
The cornea, the rod, the pupil, the iris... none of which serve any other function. And if any of them were missing, you couldn't see.

False again. You wouldn't see as well without rods, but you wouldn't be blind either (ever hear of night-vision loss from vitamin-A deficiency)

70 posted on 03/09/2004 10:42:49 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia-American
You wouldn't see as well without rods, but you wouldn't be blind either (ever hear of night-vision loss from vitamin-A deficiency)

I knew of someone who was missing either rods or cones in his eyes. He was legally blind, but apparently had good nightvision (so I suspect that it was probably cones, rather than rods).
71 posted on 03/09/2004 11:46:31 PM PST by Dimensio (I gave you LIFE! I -- AAAAAAAAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson